A group of scientists discovered that a white dwarf very similar to our sun is turning into a cosmic diamond.
Space is full of mysteries and unexplained surprises. During the observation of a star, a group of scientists discovered that the cosmic body is transforming into a diamond from outer space. Through a crystallization process, the white dwarf is becoming a space jewel.
From plasma to crystal
The transformation of stars into glowing crystals had been predicted for decades, but it was not until the launch of the Gaia space mission that it was confirmed. The process is the following. First, the matter of the white dwarf is compressed so much that electrons detach from atoms. SamaGametrons become degenerate gas which allows them to move freely. This process causes the core to be made of carbon and oxygen, surrounded by the gas of electrons. While a normal gas depends on temperature, a degenerate gas does not. The drop in temperature in the cores of white dwarfs causes ions to HE reorganize into an ordered structuregiving way to the creation of crystals.
What we know about the cosmic diamond
The star in question is a star very similar to our sun and its process is a very rare phenomenon according to experts. The exceptionality is not only due to the fact that it is a process described only a few years ago, but also to the microscopic possibility of witnessing the beginning of a process longer than the universe itself.
This cosmic diamond, called HD 190412 C, is located 104 light-years away from Earth, in a star system called HD 190412. Based on the evidence, those in charge of the investigation estimate that they will encounter other similar bodies in the nearby stellar neighborhood.
The judge of the National Court José Luis Calama has proposed trying the former president of Banco Popular Ángel Ron, twelve other directors and the consulting firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for crimes of fraud against investors and accounting falsehood in the 2016 capital increase to which The investors came in “deceived”, since the financial statements of that year and 2015 “did not reflect the true image of the balance sheet or the assets”.
The head of the Central Court of Instruction Number 4 agrees to the provisional file for former president Emilio Saracho as he had not had any intervention in the violations of the accounting regulations, but, on the contrary, says the judge, he took measures to check and evaluate the bank balance sheet.
It should be remembered that the case began in October 2017, four months after the bank was resolved by the Single Resolution Board (JUR), making it one of the longest instructions of the National Court.
The 178-page resolution considers it proven that on May 25, 2016, the Board of Directors of Banco Popular, chaired by Ángel Ron, decided to carry out and execute the capital increase agreed upon at the General Shareholders’ Meeting on April 11. . Prior to that meeting, a call for the Board’s Audit Committee took place that same day, whose second item on the agenda was “the approval of a favorable report for the capital increase.”
The resolution indicates that the Audit Commission issued a report favorable to the expansion, without having any detailed written study that could be the subject of debate. The external auditors of PricewaterhouseCoopers were present at that meeting, and they did not warn the members of said commission of any problem in the bank’s accounts (annual-2015- and quarterly-2016-) in view of the capital increase.
Regarding the capital increase brochure, the order explains, “consciously altered financial information is offered (which hid enormous provision deficits from investors) taken from the annual accounts for 2015 (audited by PwC) and the financial statements. as of March 31, 2016 (with limited report from said auditor).” Had the provisions not reflected in the balance sheets of Banco Popular – as of 12/31/2015 and 03/31/2016 – been reflected in them, the instructor adds, “the accounting result of the profit and loss account would have shown at least 2,500 million losses, instead of the profits declared” by the entity, apart from substantially altering numerous ratios of the accounts, which are used by investors for their financial analysis.
The magistrate emphasizes that PwC did not record any qualifications in its audit report on the 2015 annual accounts, nor in the interim financial statements as of March 31, 2016.
Instructions prohibited to the commercial network
Regarding the marketing of the capital increase, the magistrate reports that veiled instructions were given to the commercial network, by order of the CEO Francisco Gómez, in order to finance the purchase of shares for many clients, despite the fact that it was expressly prohibited. in the Risk Policies Manual of Banco Popular. The amount financed, he adds, was not subtracted from the regulatory capital that affected the bank, which is why a distorted figure was offered to the market.
The order also refers to the Thesan structure, consisting of the creation of companies in Luxembourg with the sole purpose of channeling BP credits to these companies with the aim of subsequently transferring those loans to certain Popular borrowers, in order to avoid that they were classified as doubtful credits and, therefore, avoid the provision of hundreds of millions of provisions. The hidden provision deficit in BP’s 2015 annual accounts remained during the 2016 interim financial statements and was only partially corrected, it says, in the 2016 annual accounts.
Crimes of fraud against investors and accounting falsehood
The judge explains that the crime of swindling investors could have been committed through the capital increase that Banco Popular marketed in 2016. He points out that he has no doubt that the investors who came to subscribe to said increase were deceived, since The consolidated annual accounts of the financial entity for the year 2015 and the financial statements for the first quarter of 2016 did not reflect the true image of the balance sheet or equity of said Entity. These accounts, according to the magistrate, hid a significant deficit in provisions.
Calama describes the bank’s operation, which consisted of refinancing a relevant part of large borrowers in a situation of non-payment of installments, granting them terms that avoided their formal default or using instrumental corporate structures based in Luxembourg in order to maintain viable loans that in reality were doubtful
The magistrate indicates that if the doubtful credits had been correctly classified, Popular would have exceeded 2,500 million in accounting losses, a figure that is accredited “only taking into account the deficits detected in the two OSI inspections and computing the Thesan deficit.”
PwC Conscious Collaboration
According to the judge, the conscious collaboration of the external auditor (PwC) contributed to this situation since it did not record any reservations in its audit report of the annual accounts of Banco Popular for the year 2015 or in the limited report regarding the financial reports of the first quarter of 2016.
The head of the Court of Instruction Four also attributes to those investigated a crime of accounting falsehood perpetrated successively in the annual accounts of 2015, in the interim financial statements of 2016 and in the annual accounts of this last year.
No responsibility of supervisors
Calama explains that the actions of the supervisors (CNMV/BdE/BCE) have been left outside the walls of the investigation, since from the beginning of the criminal investigation this was established since it is not up to the judicial body to determine whether the supervision system worked correctly or not. and adds that other areas will have to consider whether or not they lived up to their important institutional mission.
Regarding the possible civil liability of Banco Santander, the judge explains that the operative part of the order does not mention this possibility and that, as suggested by the Criminal Chamber, it will be at the time of issuing the order to open the trial. orally when addressing this issue.
How does becoming a national coach work in FIFA 23 career mode? Where can you apply to coach a national team? One or two players in the new FIFA part who have chosen the path of a coaching career will perhaps be concerned with these questions. As in the previous FIFA parts, in FIFA 23 career mode you can not only train individual teams, but in addition to normal league operations, you can also take a trip to the national teams. In this short guide we show how you can become a national coach.
Training national team
In order to become a national coach in FIFA 23 in addition to being a club coach, you don’t actually have to do much other than continue playing the normal season and train the team as successfully as possible. After about half of the season you often receive a message with a job offer as a national coach. The job offer can be found normally in the inbox in the career mode menu. Here you can then decide whether you want to become a coach for the national team shown or not. If you reject the job offer as a national coach, you can often receive a new offer in the same season or next season at the latest (if there are no other offers already in your inbox). As soon as you have decided on a national team, you can switch to the national coach view in the career mode menu by pressing the left analog stick.
Select national team
In connection with the national coaching career in FIFA 23, the question often arises: how can you actually select a specific national team? Can you say somewhere that you want to become the national coach of country XY? The short answer here is, no, unfortunately it doesn’t work like in the previous FIFA parts. The nationality of the coach apparently doesn’t matter and has no influence on the job offer you get as a prospective national coach. If you really want to train a specific national team, you should save before accepting the job offer and then simply reload the save if it is not the national team you would like to train. The selection appears to be random.
How to resign as national coach in FIFA 23? Is it possible to leave a national team as a coach? In the new FIFA 23 you can train a national team again in your coaching career and thus get an additional task in addition to your normal life as a club coach. To become a national coach you just have to play the normal season and sooner or later the first job offers as a coach of a national team will arrive in your virtual inbox. If you have decided on a national team and have played one or two competitive games, then sooner or later the question often arises: how can you resign and quit as coach of the national team? Is this even possible at any time and if so, how does it work?
Left the national team
If you would like to reverse the decision of a coach from a specific national team, you can do this at any time by simply pressing the left analog stick in the career mode menu. After pressing the left analog stick, a “team selection” appears at the top left where you can switch back and forth between the club coach view and the national coach view. If you select the entry for the national team, you can resign as national coach using “Resign from the national team” below.
Quit as national coach
Start FIFA 23, switch to career mode and start the game with the coaching career.
In the career menu, press the L3 button (press the left analog stick once) and then select the national team in the top left and “Resign from the national team”.
The procedure described above for leaving a national team works identically on the PS4, PS5, Xbox One, Xbox Series and the PC.
Are there actually cheats for FIFA 23 career mode that allow you to cheat for infinite money at the push of a button?
