Tag: RTX

Categories
Ξ TREND

Deal : RTX 4080 Super in the test: The second fastest graphics card!


How fast does Nvidia’s new upper-class model RTX 4080 Super work? How much power does it need and how loud does it work? The test gives answers!

Table of contents

  • RTX 4080 Super in the test: 10,240 computing units
  • TDP increased by 20 watts
  • Moderate speed advantage

  • Power consumption almost identical

  • RTX 4080 Super in the test: conclusion

With the RTX 4080 Super, Nvidia is now the third Super chip from the RTX 4000 series the Graphics cardsavailable to manufacturers. And in the tests it came dangerously close to the top graphics processor RTX 4090, as the test of the RTX 4080 Super shows.

RTX 4080 Super in the test: 10,240 computing units

At the top end, the one after that also receives RTX 4090 second strongest graphics chip RTX 4080 from the Ada Lovelace series, a fresh cell treatment. The 4080 Super can now distribute calculations to 10,240 Cuda units instead of the previous 9,728. Chip type (AD103) and size (379 mm2) are identical, but Nvidia has given the 4080 Super model an additional 16 tensor cores and four extra ray tracing cores for calculating ray tracing effects such as reflections and fine shadows.

TDP increased by 20 watts

In addition, the number of texture units responsible for calculating the surfaces of characters, objects and environments in games increases from 304 to 320. The consumption limit (TDP) increases Nvidia from 320 to 340 watts. Important: The manufacturer will stop producing the model without Super in the name; in the future, only RTX 4080 Super variants will be available in stores.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 series: technical data

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4000 series: technical data

GeForce RTX 4090

GeForce RTX 4080 Super

GeForce RTX 4080

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4070 Super

GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

GeForce RTX 4060

production

5 nanometers at TSMC

5 nanometers at TSMC

5 nanometers at TSMC

5 nanometers at TSMC

5 nanometers at TSMC

 5 nanometers at TSMC

 5 nanometers at TSMC

 5 nanometers at TSMC

 5 nanometers at TSMC

 5 nanometers at TSMC

GPU type

 AD102

 AD103

 AD103

 AD103

 AD104

 AD104

 AD104

 AD106

 AD106

 AD107

Chip size

 608mm²

 379mm²

 379mm²

 379mm²

 294mm²

 294mm²

 294mm²

 190mm²

 190mm²

 146mm²

Transistors

 76.3 billion

 45.9 billion

 45.9 billion

 45.9 billion

 35.8 billion

 35.8 billion

 35.8 billion

 22.9 billion

 22.9 billion

 18.9 billion

Shader models

 128

 80

 76

 66

 60

 56

 46

 34

 34

 24

Cuda cores

 16,384

 10,240

 9,728

 8,448

 7,680

 7,168

 5,888

 4,352

 4,352

 3,072

Base clock

 2,230MHz

 2,205MHz

 2,205MHz

 2,340MHz

 2,310MHz

 1,980MHz

 1,920MHz

 2,310MHz

 2,310MHz

 1,830MHz

Boost clock

 2,520MHz

 2,505MHz

 2,505MHz

 2,610MHz

 2,610MHz

 2,475MHz

 2,475MHz

 2,535MHz

 2,535MHz

 2,460MHz

Tensor cores

 512 (4th gen.)

 320 (4th gen.)

 304 (4th gen.)

 264 (4th gen.)

 240 (4th gen.)

 224 (4th gen.)

 184 (4th gen.)

 128 (4th gen.)

 128 (4th gen.)

 96 (4th gen.)

Ray tracing cores

 128 (3rd gen.)

 80 (3rd gen.)

 76 (3rd gen.)

 66 (3rd gen.)

 60 (3rd gen.)

 56 (3rd gen.)

 46 (3rd gen.)

 32 (3rd gen.)

 32 (3rd gen.)

 24 (3rd gen.)

Texture units

 512

 320

 304

 264

 240

 224

 184

 128

 128

 128

Graphics memory

 24GB GDDR6X

16GB GDDR6X

16GB GDDR6X

 16GB GDDR6X

 12GB GDDR6X

12GB GDDR6X

12GB GDDR6X

16GB GDDR6

 8GB GDDR6

 8GB GDDR6

Storage interface

 384 bits

 256 bits

 256 bits

 256 bits

 192 bits

 192 bits

 192 bits

 128 bits

 128 bits

 128 bits

TDP

 450 watts

 340 watts

 320 watts

 320 watts

 285 watts

 225 watts

 200 watts

 165 watts

 160 watts

 115 watts

Moderate speed advantage

Given the serious technical innovations, the RTX 4080 Super should offer a major speed advantage compared to the normal RTX 4080. But it doesn’t, as this test shows. Because Nvidia appears to have balanced everything so finely that the RTX 4080 Super doesn’t follow too closely on the heels of the top model RTX 4090. The result: The increase in performance in direct comparison to the normal RTX 4080 is moderate – on average, the super model was five percent faster in the speed tests (see speed comparison below).

Power consumption almost identical

Good: Despite the increased performance, the new RTX 4080 Super required just as much energy as the standard model. At its peak, it drew 308 watts from the socket, but for Internet and office applications and when playing 4K videos it was only 17 watts. Also good: While the fans were clearly audible, especially under full load (5.4 sones), the tested Zotac GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity Black worked silently when watching films and working with office applications.

RTX 4080 Super in the test: conclusion

At the time of testing, the new Super version of the RTX 4080 was around 150 euros more expensive than the standard model without Super in the name: 1,350 euros for the tested Zotac GeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity Black instead of around 1,200 euros. That’s a lot of wood for a speed advantage of just five percent. Given the key technical data, the 4080 Super could definitely work a bit faster. But that’s probably not possible, because the RTX 4080 Super has to maintain the necessary respect distance from the much more expensive RTX 4090. Nevertheless: The RTX 4080 Super completed the speed tests in a hurry and only used marginally more energy. But if you already have an RTX 4080 graphics card in your computer, you don’t need the new super model. However, if you are thinking about buying a 4080 graphics card, you should go for the Super version. Because Nvidia will refine the driver over the next few years and thus extract even more performance. This is unlikely with the discontinued model RTX 4080 without a super abbreviation.

Categories
Ξ TREND

The best alternatives to the NVIDIA RTX 4070: Which graphics card to buy? Tips and recommendations


Building a gaming PC from scratch (or updating the one we already have) is a process that requires time and some reflection. Everything is reduced to fit a series of components that have a good synergy between them, although always without exceeding the budget that we have previously set. Obviously, not all parts cost the same, and the one that is going to get all the attention is going to be the graphics card.

This 2023 has meant a radical change in the situation of these components. We have gone from a few years where it was almost impossible to get an assembly at a good price (at least, first hand) to a moment where we can finally see cards at sensible prices. Many are “to blame” for this shift, although much of the responsibility falls on the arrival of the new cards from NVIDIA and AMD.

As far as NVIDIA is concerned, the new RTX 4000 have arrived making a lot of noise. The launch of this new line has been staggered, with the highest-end ones coming first to the most recent RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti, the most affordable options. Be that as it may, the truth is that they all offer very good performance, although it may not be within the reach of all pockets.

For this reason, and as we did in the case of the RTX 4060, in this article we are going to give you a series of alternatives from the following on the list, the RTX 4070. Do you want to know which is the best of them? Well let’s go with it!

What to consider when buying an alternative to the NVIDIA RTX 4070?

It would be very easy at this point to recommend a card with a performance or price range to the RTX 4070, but it is worth stopping for a moment along the way to take into account a number of things. The eternal “battle” between NVIDIA and AMD cards It is present when choosing alternatives to this new RTX, but in addition to this, other points related to performance or the equipment that we have must be considered.

What are our claims when playing?

Beyond the budget (which, as we have said before, is the starting point), you also have to think very carefully about what you want to play when choosing components. There are many users who only want a gaming PC to play competitive video games and not too demanding for the hardware (such as League of Legends or Valorant), where it rewards more to have a high performance than to play at a high resolution.

In this sense, the RTX 4070 is indicated above all for all those users who are looking to play the most current titles at 1440p with outstanding performance. Here our monitor also has a lot to say, since it is useless to make a large outlay for one of these new cards if we do not have a monitor that shows the image at that resolution, with good refresh rate and minimal response time.

NVIDIA RTX 4070: is it better to choose the most current?

There is a maxim in gaming that many users follow: always bet on the latest technology. That, as far as graphics cards are concerned, goes directly to an RTX 4000 or an AMD RX 7000. It is true that these graphics cards have a plus in performance and even with exclusive technology like DLSS 3.0 (which we will talk about below), but that does not mean that they are the best option for us.

Now we can see ensembles of all kinds on sale, being even more frequent to find ensembles from last year with irresistible prices. In this sense, a great alternative in value for money is to bet on an ensemble from last year. These cards continue to offer a high level of performance and will last us many years at a good level, also being its price significantly lower than the graphics of this year.

NVIDIA or AMD graphics?: DLSS vs. FSR

In addition to performance and greater energy efficiency, the RTX 4000 have reached the market with DLSS 3.0 as one of its greatest assets. This scaling technology allows you to extract much higher performance from video games without losing sight of graphic quality and other technologies such as ray tracing. Till the date, DLSS 3.0 is exclusive to NVIDIA RTX 4000 cardsso if we want to use it we have no choice but to buy one of them.

Although it may seem like a compelling reason, the truth is that you have to take into account that this technology is not, to date, compatible with too many games. Also, AMD’s FSR (which, remember, is open source) also does its job well, and the new FSR 3 promises to offer a significant leap in quality, although it remains to be seen when it starts to reach the first compatible games.

You always have to look at the rest of the PC components

In addition to taking into account everything that we mentioned above when choosing a graph, It is also time to look carefully at the other components of the computer. For example, depending on the type of card or assembly that we choose, we may need more space inside the case, since some assemblies with three fans are quite long and require plenty of space to not be cramped.

In addition, it is also important that we carefully review how much energy our new assembly will need. If we bet on a card with high consumption, it is possible that we will also have to change or acquire a new power supply with more power, since otherwise we may have function and performance problems.

VRAM is important, but it’s not everything

When choosing a graphics card, a characteristic that is usually taken into account is the amount of memory or VRAM it has. This characteristic can become key to decide on one or the other model, since the games are more and more demanding (especially the triple A).

If we choose an assembly with little memory, we may have to change the graphics card sooner rather than later, especially if we want to always be playing the latest without suffering performance problems. However, this amount of VRAM is not a differentiator, since a greater amount of memory does not imply that the graphics card is more powerful. An RTX 4070 with 8 GB of RAM will always have more power than an RTX 4060 with 12 GB of RAM.

Are all assemblies the same?

If we start to look in the different specialized stores, it is not difficult to find several different models of the same graphics card. There are many assemblers out there today, each with their own model different from the others. These usually differ from each other in terms of design, cooling and components, although the difference that stands out the most between all of them will always be the price.

So, how can we opt for one or the other assembler? Here it is best not to be blinded by the design, but to look at other elements such as consumption, refrigeration or price. The list that you will find below includes very interesting assemblies from some of the best assemblers out there, so we are not going to have problems with any of them.

Which alternative graphics card to the NVIDIA RTX 4070 to buy

MSI AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12GB GDDR6 V1

The first alternative to appear on this list is also the cheapest. This MSI RX 6750 XT is a great option if we want to play 1440p for as little money as possible right now. This has the great advantage of having 12GB of GDDR6 VRAM, in addition to three DisplayPort 1.4 and an HDMI port. It is a fairly compact assembly although with very good cooling, and its price is currently 379.90 euros. In addition, both this and the rest of the AMD cards on the list include Starfield as a gift.

Zotac Gaming Geforce RTX 3070 Twin Edge LHR 8GB GDDR6

When looking for an alternative to the NVIDIA RTX 4070 it is logical that a mandatory stop along the way is the RTX 3070, in this case from Zotac. We have another assembly on our hands here with a compact size, a signature design and 8 GB of VRAM. It is a spectacular assembly to play 2K, and also has a fairly moderate consumption. We have it on Amazon at 499.90 euros (in PcComponentes it also marks the same price).

Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EAGLE OC 8GB GDDR6 DLSS3

If we want current technology, but without spending what most RTX 4070 assemblies cost, a very good alternative is to go down a notch in terms of power. The RTX 4060 Ti is quite an interesting option, as it offers high performance and support for DLSS 3.0. This Gigabyte assembly already has a larger size, three powerful fans, 8GB of VRAM and good connectivity. It costs 438.99 euros.

XFX SPEEDSTER MERC319 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT CORE 16GB GDDR6

We’ve already said that last year’s builds are very attractively priced now, so it’s a good time to level up. This XFX RX 6800 XT is a good example, a graphics card with which we will have no problem playing at 1440p or even 4K. Its design is quite minimalist with straight lines, it has 3 fans and has 16 GB of VRAM. The price that it currently marks is brutal (for what it cost a few months ago): it costs 529.90 euros in PcComponentes.

XFX Speedster MERC 319 AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Black Gaming 16GB GDDR6

The last alternative on the list is also the most powerful of all. If we want approximately what an RTX 4070 costs in more power, the correct option is to go for the XFX RX 6950 XT, superior to the RX 6900 XT. This is AMD’s top of the line from last year, a great card for 4K gaming with outstanding performance. It is quite demanding as far as necessary power is concerned, but its price is not crazy right now: in PcComponentes it costs 659.90 euros.

Categories
Ξ TREND

Nvidia RTX 3070 will be a threat to Xbox Series X but not PS5, Digital Foundry explains why

The new GPUs of Nvidia, the series RTX 3000, promises to catapult PC gamers into the world of the next generation and beyond, with tech specs to make any console pale.

Precisely by virtue of their potential, second Richard Leadbetter of Digital foundry, the new graphics cards from Nvidia, in particular the RTX 3070, will pose a real threat to Xbox Series X… and only for her, why PlayStation 5 it should be safe.

The explanation behind this reasoning? Quite simply, the RTX 3070 will cost 519 euros / 499 dollars and will offer, at or near the same price as a next-gen console, much better performance and performance. This will make it a great choice for those who want to jump into next-gen gaming PCs, without spending the extra money on higher-class RTX GPUs.

While the Xbox Series X exclusives, by the express will of Microsoft, will also be released on PC, buying a console would mean playing something of lower quality than what you can get at the same price with an RTX 3070. That would, according to Digital Foundry, be the risk that newer Nvidia GPUs pose for the next one – gen from Microsoft.

Why should the PlayStation 5 be immune to all of this? Basically because, although it also has lower performance than a 3070, the first exclusive parts will remain exclusive for consoles and will not land on PC. In short, having a gaming PC and an Xbox Series X would become superfluous and redundant, while a PC and a PS5 would ensure a full range of video games available.

Obviously, we have to add the necessary premises to the Digital Foundry discourse: of course, Nvidia’s new GPUs would provide better performance than next-gen consoles, but a gaming PC is not just made up of a GPU and many other components are needed to create it; the assembly costs of such a PC would certainly exceed those of a console which, on the other hand, guarantees instant access to next-gen games, with no additional components to purchase. A different story if you already have a powerful PC and just need to switch graphics cards, but it was worth pointing out.

Additionally, although Sony is a fan of console exclusives, it has recently observed the PC market with great interest and excluding Death Stranding, exclusive PS4 console, but developed by a third-party studio, Horizon Zero Dawn has shown that the arrival on PC of its first parties can now not be ruled out.

Of course, even if the PS5 titles end up on the PC, they will first have to spend a long time in “isolation” on the Sony console.

In short, despite a few snippets, Digital Foundry’s reasoning makes sense. What do you think about it? If you have a powerful PC, would you still buy an Xbox Series X? Or do you share DF’s thought?

Source: DigitalFoundry

Categories
Ξ TREND

Tekken 8 pulls out literal and graphic muscle thanks to the RTX 4090 and 8K resolution in its first benchmarks


As many of you already know, Tekken 8 recently launched its first closed beta. During this, not a few players are offering their first impressions. In general, Bandai Namco’s new fighting game is quite liking, although it is giving some performance problems. Developed with Unreal Engine 5, it has already been seen that is suffering with the compilation of . However, we must not forget that it is a first beta, so it is logical that it suffers certain difficulties.

That’s what tests are for: to detect errors… Among other things. As is logical, many users have wondered what is the graphic top of the new Bandai and the truth is that at the moment it is very high. This has been shown to us by John Papadopoulos, a content creator who has uploaded a very, very interesting performance test to his YouTube channel.

Tekken 8 looks amazing in 8K with the RTX 4090

In this, John runs Tekken 8 on an NVDIA RTX 4090 in 8K resolution. Of course, the maximum quality at which we can see the video is limited by the resolution of our monitor or mobile device. Bearing this in mind, I, for example, have been able to see it at 4K… And the result has continued to seem crazy to me. First, because of how good it looks. Second, for its stability.

Although we do not know how much RAM it has or what processor it has, since it does not indicate it, yes we know that you have used an RTX 4090 and that it looks just great. Besides, and this is what matters most to us, is that its performance is really good. Using the 4090 with the graphics settings maxed out, Tekken 8 runs between a stable and smooth 50-60 FPS. That is to say, that at 8k it performs very well.

If we take into account that most users will play it at lower resolutions, it is very likely that it meets one of the maxims of almost any fighting game: stability. This is a very important detail. So, and although we hope that the theme of them will improve with the next betas or already at launch, the game could be a true technical monster once it lands on our gaming platforms.