EA Sports FC 24 is under development for both old and next generation. But what are the differences between the Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S versions? Is the expensive upgrade to the next generation worth it? We explain it to you!
The separation between EA Sports and FIFA is official. The successor to FIFA 23 is called “FC 24”. Aside from the name and some additional innovations, the game remains the same.
However, there are significant differences between the different console generations and platforms. We’ll explain if upgrading from Xbox One to Xbox Series X/S is worth it.
The differences between the Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S versions of EA FC 24
The most obvious difference is the console. The Xbox One is far behind in terms of capacity compared to the Xbox Series X/S, which can implement completely different technologies. And you can directly notice it in the game.
However, what is also noticeable is the significant price difference between the consoles. If you only play a few hours a month, you don’t necessarily need an Xbox Series X/S.
EA FC 24 on Xbox One
EA FC 24 will be available on Xbox One. You can purchase or pre-order the Standard or Ultimate edition. The pre-order bonuses are also the same as for Xbox Series X/S. The standard edition price is $79.99, so the Xbox One version is just as expensive as the Xbox Series X/S version.
However, Xbox One owners also have to give up some things. This was already the case with FIFA 23, and we were really disappointed with EA. The image stuttered, sometimes froze, and was generally extremely slow.
Creating a relaxed Dream Squad in Ultimate Team was sadly not fun as you sometimes had to struggle through the menu, like in FIFA 09. It was definitely different on Xbox Series X/S as the menu worked well and game times Expectations were minimal.
As for how this improved in EA FC 24, remains to be seen. However, you can assume that EA will focus its resources more on developing next-gen games, because that’s the future.
In a few years, the majority of gamers will own an Xbox Series X/S, and developers will no longer prioritize Xbox One gamer satisfaction.
FIFA 23 gameplay on the Xbox One version was decent, although it was in no way comparable to gameplay on Xbox Series X/S. However, we don’t know what new technology features are intended to be used for EA FC 24 (hint: resources).
So EA will try to sell you a refurbished EA FC 24 for Xbox One, even though there will be hardly any gameplay changes.
.
EA FC 24 on Xbox Series X/S
The Xbox Series X/S is the console of the future and can handle all new technologies like Hypermotion. The gameplay is completely different since the old Xbox One cannot implement features like AcceleRATE.
Features like AcceleRATE or the latest Hypermotion animations offer more realistic yet refreshing gameplay.
In general, the Xbox Series X/S has noticeably faster load times, its drive (if any) is quiet, and it just looks cooler.
Xbox Series X/S is connected via cross-play with PlayStation 5 and PC, giving you more options to connect with friends.
Xbox Series X/S is clearly superior to Xbox One in every way. It would be sad if Microsoft released a console upgrade where you wouldn’t notice any difference.
However, what is noticeable is the high price… It is quite heavy.
EA FC 24: Comparing Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S
Now for the ultimate comparison between the Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S versions of EA FC 24:
FC24 EA Features
XboxOne
Xbox series X/S
All game modes
✅
✅
Fast loading times
❌
✅
good gameplay
✅
✅
Crossplay
✅ (PS4)
✅ (PS5, PC)
hypermovement
❌
✅
Accelerate
❌
✅
Early Access
✅
✅
Standard Edition Price
$79.99
$79.99
Ultimate Edition Price
$109.99
$109.99
Console Price
used version approx. $100
Series X: approx. $499
Prices are dynamic and may change at any time, and may vary by provider. The prices mentioned are for the “normal” Xbox One (not the Pro version) and the Xbox Series X.
Xbox One is primarily available for purchase as used. Then the $499 for an Xbox Series X/S doesn’t seem too expensive. The S-Series is even more affordable.
By the way, Xbox One and Xbox Series X/S have the same FUT transfer market. However, Xbox One players are at a disadvantage when shooting players due to longer loading times.
So which version is the best? Our answer is clear: Xbox series X/S. Even though the game and console are slightly more expensive, the extra cost is worth it for better gameplay and faster load times.
This article contains affiliate links which are marked with (shopping symbol). These links may earn us a small commission under certain conditions. It never affects the price of the products for you.
EA Sports FC 24 is under development for both old and next generation. But what are the differences between the PS4 and PS5 versions? Is the expensive upgrade to the next generation worth it? We explain it to you!
The separation between EA Sports and FIFA is official. The successor to FIFA 23 is called “FC 24” or “Electronic Arts Sports Football Club Twenty-Four”, as they say here at the office of SamaGame.com. However, aside from the name and a few minor innovations, the game remains largely the same.
Where there are sometimes significant differences is between different console generations and platforms. We will explain if upgrading from PlayStation 4 to PlayStation 5 is worth it.
The differences between the PS4 and PS5 versions of EA FC 24
The most obvious difference is the console. The PS4 is far from having the capabilities of the PS5, which can implement completely different technologies. And you can notice it directly in the game.
However, what you also notice is the significant price difference between the consoles. If you only play a few hours a month, you don’t have to buy a PS5.
There is no longer a shortage, and the PS5 is available everywhere, for example at Amazon.
EA FC 24 on PS4
EA FC 24 will be available for the PS4. You can purchase or pre-order the standard or ultimate edition. The pre-order bonuses are also the same as for the PS5. The standard edition will be priced at $79.99, making the PS4 version the same price as the PS5 version.
However, PS4 owners also have to do without a few things. This was already the case in FIFA 23, and we were very disappointed with EA. The game stuttered, sometimes froze, and was generally extremely slow.
Building a casual dream team in Ultimate Team unfortunately wasn’t fun at all as navigating the menus felt like FIFA 09 at times. It was definitely different on the PlayStation 5 as the menu worked fine and the wait times were boundaries.
How much this will improve for EA FC 24 remains to be seen. However, you can expect EA to prioritize allocating its resources to developing next-gen games, because that’s quite simply the future.
In a few years, the majority of gamers will own a PS5, and developers will no longer prioritize PS4 gamer satisfaction.
The FIFA 23 gameplay on the PS4 version was decent, although it couldn’t compare to the PS5 gameplay at all. However, we do not know what new technological features are supposed to be used for EA FC 24 (in terms of resources).
So EA will try to sell you a refurbished EA FC 24 for the PS4, even though there will be virtually no gameplay changes.
.
EA FC 24 on PS5
The PS5 is the console of the future, integrating various new technologies like Hypermotion. The gameplay is completely different as the old PS4 cannot implement features like AcceleRATE.
Features such as AcceleRATE or the latest Hypermotion animations provide a more realistic yet refreshing gaming experience.
In general, the PS5 has much faster load times, it’s not noisy, and the game just looks so much better.
PS5 is connected via cross-play with Xbox Series X/S and PC, giving you more options to connect with friends.
The PS5 is obviously superior to the PS4 in every aspect. It would be sad if Sony released a console upgrade with no noticeable differences.
However, you notice the high price… It’s different.
EA FC 24: comparison PS4 and PS5
Now for the ultimate EA FC 24 comparison between PS4 and PS5:
FC24 EA Features
PS4
PS5
all game modes
✅
✅
fast loading times
❌
✅
good gameplay
✅
✅
cross play
✅ (XboxOne)
✅ (Xbox Series X/S, PC)
hypermovement
❌
✅
Accelerate
❌
✅
Early Access
✅
✅
standard edition price
$79.99
$79.99
ultimate edition price
$109.99
$109.99
console price
approximately. $300
approximately. $550
Prices are dynamic and may change at any time, and the price may also vary from supplier to supplier. However, the consoles are in this price range. Prices shown are for the “regular” PS4 (not the Pro version) and PS5 with drive.
But did you expect the PS4 to cost another $300? Pretty expensive for a console that’s been around for a decade… Then the $550 for a PS5 doesn’t seem that expensive.
By the way, PS4 and PS5 have the same FUT transfer market. However, if you want to snipe a player on the PS4, you have a downside due to loading times.
So which version is the best? Our answer is quite clear: PlayStation 5. Even though the game and console are slightly more expensive, the extra cost is worth it for better gameplay and faster load times.
This article contains affiliate links that are marked with (shopping symbol). These links may earn us a small commission under certain conditions. It never affects the price of the products for you.
Ubisoft is developing up to 11 different titles for the Assassin’s Creed saga, with AC Red being the most striking for fans due to its Japanese setting.
Assassin’s Creed Red is the code name of the next game in the successful Ubisoft saga that will finally take us to feudal Japan, a setting that fans have been eagerly anticipating for years. Today we will be reviewing the similarities and differences between Assassin’s Creed Red and previous installments, based on official information and rumors that have emerged so far. Assassin’s Creed Red will be set in the 16th century, during the Sengoku period, a time of civil warspolitical conflicts and social changes in Japan.
The protagonist will be a shinobi, a warrior expert in the art of stealth, espionage and murder, who will have to face the samurai, the noble warriors who dominated the battlefield with their armor and their katanas. According to the presentation trailer, the game will feature the presence of the Animus, the device that allows the memories of the assassins’ ancestors to be revived, which implies that there will be a part of the story set in the present.
Know all the similarities and differences between Assassin’s Creed Red and previous installments
This setting represents a big difference with respect to previous installments, which had focused on other regions and historical periods, such as Egypt, Greece, England or Scandinavia. However, There are also some similarities, such as the fact that the game will still be an RPG open world, with main and secondary missions, exploration, combat and stealth.
In addition, Assassin’s Creed Red is expected to maintain the option to choose between two playable characters, one male and one female, as already happened in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.
Gameplay and mechanics
Assassin’s Creed Red promises to introduce some new features and improvements to the gameplay and mechanics of the saga, taking advantage of the new technologies of next-generation consoles and the most powerful computers. According to Marc-Alexis Côté, vice president and executive producer of Assassin’s Creed, the game will have a more dynamic world that will evolve around the players, showing the wear of weapons and clothingimproving the fidelity of animations and artificial intelligence systems, and creating more complex and difficult to navigate environments.
Another novelty will be the inclusion of a progression system based on skills and not levels, which will allow players to customize their playing style according to their preferences. Furthermore, it has been confirmed that Assassin’s Creed Red will feature cooperative multiplayer for up to four players, something rare to see in the saga. On the other hand, some classic mechanics of the saga will be maintained, such as the use of the hidden blade to kill enemies, parkour to move across roofs and walls, or the eagle to explore the map.
Additional content and post-launch support
Assassin’s Creed Red will not be an isolated game, but rather will be part of the virtual world of Assassin’s Creed Infinity, an ambitious project that aims to create an online platform that connects all the games in the saga and offers new and varied content to players. According to Ubisoft, Assassin’s Creed Infinity will be a living experience that will evolve over time and adapt to the preferences of the community.
This means that Assassin’s Creed Red will receive post-launch support for many years, with expansions, updates and other types of additional content that will expand its story, its gameplay and its world. Côté has assured that the game will have DLC after its release and has announced that there are «a lot of things I can’t reveal yet«. At the moment, the release date for Assassin’s Creed Red is unknown, but it is expected to be one of Ubisoft’s big releases for 2024 or 2025.
The graphical evolution on the battlefield of GPUs surprises every day with innovative improvements for gaming
Scaling technologies such as AMD FSR 3 and NVIDIA DLSS 3 are redefining graphics performance in the world of video games. As gamer expectations rise, these innovations are becoming the core of an improved gaming experience. AMD has introduced the latest version of its FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) technology, FSR 3 to go head-to-head with NVIDIA’s DLSS 3.
This version of FSR It promises great improvements in performance and image compared to its predecessor. At the same time, FSR 3 remains a open technology which can run on any modern GPU, including those from AMD, Intel and NVIDIA. At the same time, it introduces new features such as “Fluid Motion Frames” to improve frame rates. However, despite the progress, FSR 3 does not employ AI tricks like NVIDIA does with its DLSS 3.5which could result in similar frame rate gains but with less detail than DLSS.
AMD FSR3 vs NVIDIA DLSS 3: Which is better?
Instead, the DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) from NVIDIA, in version 3.5, uses artificial intelligence to assist in your scaling process, using a model called Ray Reconstruction to create high-quality ray-traced images. This AI-based approach appears to provide a noticeable improvement in scaled image quality, something that FSR 3being based on complex algorithms, still is trying to reach.
On the other hand, the fervent battle between AMD and NVIDIA in the field of graphical scaling is at its peak, and although FSR 3 has made significant steps, NVIDIA’s DLSS 3.5 appears to have an advantage in terms of image quality. FSR 3’s “Fluid Motion Frames” feature is a response to DLSS 3’s “Frame Generation”, although it remains to be seen how it compares in practice.
It is well known that, Both technologies are beginning to be adopted by several video game titles, offering gamers across different platforms the opportunity to experience enhanced graphics and optimized performance. The first games to incorporate FSR 3 are Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum, with more DirectX 11 and 12 games on the horizon. On NVIDIA’s side, games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Battlefield V have already benefited from previous versions of DLSS.
The evolution of graphical scaling
Luckily for all the players, competition between AMD and NVIDIA is driving innovation in the space of graphical performance in video games. As more titles adopt these technologies, players will find themselves in the middle of a graphics revolution that promises to transform the way we experience virtual worlds. While it remains to be seen how these technologies compare in real-world use, one thing is certain: the evolution of graph scaling is here to staypromising a richer and more immersive gaming experience in the near future.
Today we are going to explain what does VTC mean and what are the differences with taxis, and we are going to try to do it in a simple way so that everyone can understand it. Because these days with the taxi strikes that collapse Madrid and Barcelona, this terminology referring to services such as Uber or Cabify is being used a lot, and at Basics we want to try to make everyone understand it.
We are going to try to make it simple and without many figures and data dizziness, for that you have all the coverage in Engadget. We will start by first explaining to you what the term VTC means and in what type of services it is used. And we will finish, as we said at the beginning, telling you in summary some of the main differences with respect to taxis.
What does VTC mean
VTC is the acronym with which the term transport vehicle with driver is known, which is how it is called chauffeured vehicles that transport one or more passengers from one place of origin to another of destination.
Its difference with conventional public transport is that with VTC the passenger chooses both the starting point and the destination. This is different from other public means of chauffeured transport, which usually have certain assigned pick-up points and specific stops along the way. It is also different from simple car rental, where you are the one who has to drive and no one takes you.
Although according to this definition, taxis are also transport vehicles with a driver, The term VTC is used to talk about the rest of services other than taxi. Its activity is based on licenses, and is similar to other classics such as chauffeur and limousine services.
However, and although these characteristics almost always left them in the background, the appearance of services such as Cabify and Uber have given a new dimension to VTC, which little by little have been gaining weight within the transportation alternatives.
VTCs also have to always carry a sticker that distinguishes them from the rest, which must always be visible from the outside of the car. The design of these stickers depends on each community, and for example in Madrid, Valencia or Catalonia they must carry a sticker with the regional sign.
How they differ from taxis
Although they are all chauffeured vehicle services, there are some differences that mark the line between taxis and VTCs like Uber or Cabify. The first is in the way in which both services are contracted, since while digital VTCs all have a prepaid service and prices that are calculated before hiring, taxis usually work with a fee and do not pay until the end.
In addition, you can hail taxis on the street, take them at a taxi rank or request them through a phone call or with one of the mobile applications that exist. In this aspect, the VTCs are more limited, since they can’t stop to look for customers on the street, and they can only offer service to those who contract the service through the mobile application, in which the collection point will also be stipulated.
There are also differences in licenses, limited to two per person in taxis and without a similar limit in VTC. However, in both cases we are facing a possible bubble due to the way in which the resale prices of both types of license are growing. Even so, the prices of the taxi licenses are notably higher than those of the VTC.
After a decree law approved in 2018, from 2022 the current licenses of the VTCs will only allow to operate in the interurban area instead of being able to start and end a service within the same city. That year, the power to grant licenses will be transferred to the communities and municipalities. There is also a ratio so that there can only be 1 VTC license for every 30 taxi.
And finally there are the rates. The prices of VTCs are generally lower than those of taxis, although they are much more volatile, and in times of vehicle shortage they can rise and even exceed that of the taxi. However, despite this, Uber and Cabify have the aforementioned certainty in their favor, since users will know the total cost of the trips before hiring them, and they will not even have to pay by hand or look for money when doing everything from the mobile.
There are also differences in the salaries of drivers, which although users are not directly affected, it is something that we cannot fail to mention. As we were told on Magnet, taxi drivers without a license can earn 1,200 euros net per month in 50-hour days, while drivers of some VTC services charge less than 1,100 euros net per month, after deducting the expenses of activity, it has been reported that sometimes they do not exceed 800 euros.
Soon there may be more differences
Although there is still a bit of confusion, it seems that new differences between the two types of service are going to emerge from these latest mobilizations in the taxi sector. The Catalan Government has ended up giving in to the pressure of taxis, and will force Uber and Cabify to operate under a one-hour pre-contract. This means that in this community you will no longer be able to use these services so that they come to pick you up immediately, but you will have to “reserve” it an hour in advance.
It is not yet clear whether the measure will remain in Catalonia or will be extended to the rest of Spain. In fact, in the taxi roadmap there are measures such as an equal law for the whole country, the regulation of VTC schedules and ordering of its operation, and the imposition of municipal rates.
In the Apple catalog it is possible to find several models of totally wireless Bluetooth headphones (not counting those from the Beats by Dr. Dre brand, which also belongs to Apple). The 3rd generation AirPods are the most balanced, with a relatively tight quality-price ratio for the figures managed by the company.
However, they lack a function that is becoming increasingly important: active noise cancellation. And since there are much cheaper Bluetooth headphones that do have it, they are no longer the first option for many users.
If you were to compare them to other Bluetooth headphones that lack active noise cancellation, the Marshall Minor III They could be an option, although their RRP is noticeably lower than the bitten apple proposal. So if you were thinking about purchasing wireless headphones, and ANC is not essential, you may be interested in the Minor III, and we are going to put them face to face to find out their characteristics, differences and prices.
Features Apple AirPods 3 and Marshall Minor III
Specifications
apple airpods (3rd generation)
marshall minor iii
dimensions and weight
3.08 x 1.83 x 1.93 cm and weight of 4.28 grams
4 grams
SOUND TECHNOLOGY
Adaptive EQ
Apple Custom High Excursion Transducer
Custom high dynamic range amplifier
Spatial audio with dynamic head tracking
12mm driver
Driver Sensitivity: 93 dB SPL (179 mV @ 1 kHz)
Controller type: dynamic
Frequency response: 20 – 20,000 Hz
SENSORS
Skin sensor, accelerometer with motion detection, accelerometer with voice detection and pressure sensor
Touch sensor for control
MICROPHONES
Two microphones with beamforming technology and inward-facing microphone
Yeah
CONNECTIVITY
Bluetooth 5.0 and H1 chip
Bluetooth 5.2 (SBC + aptX codecs)
CONTROLS
Press once to play audio, pause it, or answer a call
Press twice to go to the next song
Press three times to go back to the previous song
Press and hold to activate Siri
Say “Hey Siri” to listen to a song, make a call, get directions, and more
Control music
Receive, reject and end calls
Battery
Up to six hours of audio playback on a charge (up to five hours with spatial audio enabled)
Up to four hours of talk time on one charge
With the case up to 30 hours of audio playback and up to 20 hours of talk time
Up to five hours of playback
Up to 25 hours with the case
15 minute quick charge equals 1.5 hours
Wireless charging
endurance
Sweat and water resistant (IPX4)
Sweat and water resistant (IPX4)
price
From 199 euros
129 euros
sound technology– AirPods 3rd generation have adaptive EQ, Apple’s custom high-excursion transducer, custom high dynamic range amplifier, and Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking. The Marshall Minor III have 12mm dynamic drivers and a frequency response of 20 to 20,000 Hz.
Sensors: Marshall’s proposal incorporates a touch sensor to control content and calls. The Apple one offers a skin sensor, accelerometers with motion and voice detection, as well as a pressure sensor.
Microphones– Both headphones have microphones. The AirPods are two with beamforming technology.
Connectivity: The Marshall Minor III connects to devices via Bluetooth 5.2 and the Apple ones have Bluetooth 5.0, with an H1 chip.
Controls– Touch controls on both earbuds for music and calls.
Battery: AirPods 3 have autonomy of around six hours per charge and up to 30 hours with the charging case, but if Spatial Audio is activated the battery is reduced. The Marshall Minor III offers five hours per charge and up to 25 hours with the case, in addition to wireless charging.
Endurance: IPX4 protection in both cases.
Price: from 199 euros for the AirPods and 129 euros for the Marshalls.
AirPods 3rd generation VS Marshall Minor III, which Bluetooth headphones to buy?
The 3rd generation AirPods are one of Apple’s best wireless Bluetooth headphones. At least, they are the most balanced. But are not since they have a fairly high price, they lack active noise cancellation and their compatibility is limited to Apple devices.
The Marshall Minor III also do not have ANC and their autonomy is slightly less than that of Apple headphones, but they attract attention for their design and sound. Let’s discuss some details in more depth. that can make the difference between choosing one or the other.
sound technology
As has already been mentioned several times, both models of Bluetooth headphones lack active noise cancellationwhich is a function as interesting as it is useful for users looking for greater concentration or disconnection in saturated or noisy environments.
However, it must be taken into account that the 3rd generation AirPods have Spatial audio with dynamic head trackingwhich is a function that puts the user in the center of the content being listened to, whether movies, series or even music, and that surrounds and follows them as they move their head.
The Marshall Minor III does not have functions of this type, but they are compatible with the aptX codec, which is a technology that allows you to improve audio quality significantly and enjoy higher quality wireless sound.
Compatibility
It’s no surprise that Apple devices are a bit complicated when it comes to compatibility. Between them they work perfectly, but when used with those from other companies, problems appear. And although the incompatibility is not complete as in the Apple Watch and Android smartphones, AirPods functions diminish when used with, for example, a Galaxy device.
This is something that does not happen with the Marshall Minor III since they are not designed to work with specific devices. They work with both Android or Apple phones and tablets, as well as Windows or Mac computers.
The price
It must also be kept in mind that there is a price difference between Bluetooth headphones. The 3rd generation AirPods start at 199 euros for those with the Lightning charging case, and a little more if you want them to have the MagSafe charging case compatible with Qi bases.
The Marshall Minor III are not the cheapest wireless Bluetooth headphones on the market either, but they are cheaper than Apple’s, and if the budget is tighteror you have devices from different brands and compatibility is an essential requirement, they are more suitable.
You can be up to date and informed at all times of all the news from the Apple world and SamaGame Selección offers on our Twitter, Facebook and Telegram profiles.
It is no longer common to find televisions on the market that are not “smart”. The manufacturers They usually provide an operating system, Internet access and applications of streaming video services, among others, to provide the user with the possibility of consuming multimedia content from platforms such as Netflix, Prime Video, HBO Max or Apple TV+ at any time they wish.
However, experience varies wildly from brand to brand. Even from the same firm, opting for a mid-range or high-end model sometimes means an abyss in terms of performance and benefits (not to mention that they become obsolete sooner rather than later). This is why the best advice when buying a new television is to look for the one with the best panel and within the budget.
And this is because it is possible to make a television “smart” with external devicesthe so-called multimedia center or that are present in various formats: from the well-known Fire TV Stick or Google Chromecast to the “boxes” Nvidia Shield TV or Xiaomi TV Box.
One of the best on the market is the Apple TV 4K for its performance, application catalog and image quality. But it is not the only one to take into account, especially if we are talking about proposals with the Android TV operating system, since the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 is postulated as one of the best alternatives due to its possibilities and price, which is not as high as the bitten apple product. We compare them to know their characteristics, differences and prices.
Features Apple TV 4K and Nokia Streaming Box 8010
Specifications
apple tv 4k (2022)
nokia streaming box 8010
dimensions and weight
3.1 cm x 9.3 cm x 9.3 cm and 208 grams (214 grams the model with Ethernet)
SDR with AVC/HEVC up to 2160@60 fps, Dolby Vision up to 2160@60 fps, HDR10+/HDR10/HLG with HEVC up to 2160@60 fps, H.264 and MPEG-4
4K@60fps, H.265, VP9, AV1 and Dolby Vision HDR
sound
HE-AAC (V1), AAC (up to 320 Kbps), Protected AAC (iTunes Store), MP3 (up to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Apple Lossless, FLAC, AIFF, WAV, AC-3 (Dolby Digital 5.1), E-AC-3 (Dolby Digital Plus 7.1 surround sound) and Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos and DTS up to 7.1 through its HDMI port and 5.1 pro SPDIF (not compatible with streaming apps)
OS
tvOS 16
android tv 11
connectivity
HDMI 2.1 (CEC), Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0 and IR receiver. Top model with Gigabit Ethernet and Thread support
HDMI 2.1 (CEC), USB-C (power only), USB 3.0, USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, AV Jack, MicroSD, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0
remote control
Siri Remote with Bluetooth 5.0, IR transmitter, USB-C for charging, TV control via CEC or IR, physical buttons for direction, pause/play, volume, mute and microphone for Siri
Backlit Bluetooth remote control with full keypad. Shortcuts to YouTube, Netflix, Google Play, Prime Video and Google Assistant. Volume up/down, channel change, mute, pause, resume…
others
Siri, frame rate matching and native dynamic range, game controller support, HomeKit switchboard
Chromecast built-in, 7,000+ apps available, game controller support
price
From 169 euros
129 euros
Processor: Apple TV 4K is powered by the A15 Bionic chip, the same one the company has used in some tablets and smartphones, so there’s no performance issue with any task you can do. The Nokia Streaming Box 8010 has a 64-bit Amlogic quad-core processor with which there will be no problem running the operating system either.
RAM and storage: Both media centers come with 4 GB of RAM, although there are differences in the amount of internal storage: 32 GB on the Nokia and 64 or 128 GB on the Apple TV 4K.
video and sound: Both proposals can reproduce multimedia content in high resolution 4K Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos sound.
OS: Apple TV 4K runs tvOS 16 and the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 comes standard with Android TV 11.
connectivity: Both devices have HDMI 2.1, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5. However, the Nokia has a pair of USB-A, Gigabit Ethernet as standard (you have to pay a little more on Apple TV to have it), AV jack, MicroSD and USB-C (for charging only).
Others: Apple TV 4K features Siri, frame-matching and native dynamic range, support for game controllers, and HomeKit switchboard. The Nokia Streaming Box 8010 has Chromecast, access to more than 7,000 applications, and also supports game controllers.
Price: Apple TV 4K (3rd generation) is available from 169 euros, and the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 has an RRP of 129 euros.
Nokia Streaming Box 8010 VS Apple TV 4K (3rd generation), which media center to buy?
The Apple TV 4K is one of the most unknown devices of the brand for the general publicsince it does not generate as many expectations nor is it as “essential” as an iPhone, iPad or Mac. But that is not why it is useless, since there are many users who use it to access their favorite content even if they have a latest model television of thousands euros with a recent operating system, especially if they are immersed in the Apple ecosystem.
However, like the Nokia Streaming Box 8010, It has some delicate points or that make it directly a discard for certain groups of usersBesides, it is quite expensive. So we are going to analyze them in depth to know their strengths and weaknesses.
Yield per flag
The 3rd generation Apple TV 4K is one of the most powerful multimedia centers on the market. That’s how it is. That Apple has endowed it with the chip A15 Bionic It is the assurance that the user will not find any type of performance problem when using it.
Since the Apple TV is not only a device to consume multimedia content from Netflix or Prime Video, but also it is also a “game console”. The Apple Arcade subscription service allows users to enjoy titles such as , , , , , among many others, and the device is compatible with game console controls such as the PS4, the PS5 DualSense or the Xbox.
If you are going to install many applications, especially video games, you have to take into account the internal storage capacitysince the base model of the 3rd generation Apple TV 4K comes with 64 GB, there is a superior option with double, 128 GB.
The Nokia Streaming Box 8010 is not up to the performance of the Apple TV 4K (2022), but this is not a problem either if it is going to be used mainly for its purpose: watching series and movies. And it is that Its processor, together with 4 GB of RAM, makes the operating system run wonderfully and the experience is optimal, which is what fails in alternatives such as Google or Xiaomi: fair hardware, bittersweet experience.
The software problem
If the 3rd generation Apple TV 4K wants to shine for its hardware, it’s the software that keeps it in the shade. And not because tvOS 16, its operating system, is bad, but it is very limited and does not take advantage of the full potential that the processor can offer. This is because apps from the store can’t squeeze it, and Apple doesn’t allow users to install apps that aren’t on the App Store.
Thus, unless the user is willing to tinker a bit, they cannot enjoy emulators or one of the most widely used applications in multimedia centers: KODI, which is a media player with Virtually endless possibilities thanks to the option to install plugins () and unleash its full potential. This is possible with the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 when using Android TV.
In addition, there is the issue of the ecosystem. It is not necessary to have another device from the company to enjoy Apple TV, but it is true that it is designed for use by users who, at least, have an iPhone or iPad. And it is that it benefits from having more products from Californians by offering AirPlay 2, integration with HomeKit and support for the HomePod, so the speaker can be converted into a sound bar that provides very good quality audio.
The same happens with users who have Android devices and the Nokia Streaming Box 8010, because when using Android TV comes with Chromecast and Google Assistantand Google is working to make the unified experience even more powerful.
Automatic adjustment of the frame rate (refresh)
This could be something that fits perfectly into the previous point, but it is so important that it deserves to be mentioned separately. Automatic frame rate adjustment is a feature that allows Apple TV to play content the way it was recorded for proper consumption.. It may seem simple, but it is a feature that is not implemented in all devices of this type; even some as popular as Amazon’s Fire TV only do it halfway because almost no app is adapted (although Netflix recently added support).
The Nokia Streaming Box 8010 does not have the automatic refresh rate adjustment function because it comes with Android TV 11, and it is a feature that Google integrated natively in Android TV 12, so you have to wait for the device to is updated (although there is no news about it). In fact, the only device that does it officially is the Chromecast with Google TV.
This makes Apple TV one of the best multimedia centersbut it must also be taken into account that not all applications are developed with this function and we will find the problems suffered by the alternatives, but the number of compatible apps is greater.
Clarify that not all users are affected in the same way for him for several reasons. The first is that not everyone is equally sensitive, and some notice it more than others. The second is that the television plays a fundamental role, since there are models and brands that manage this feature natively better than other alternatives.
connectivity
Nokia Streaming Box 8010 connections
The 3rd generation Apple TV 4K is not badly equipped in terms of connectivity because Apple is clear about its function: play streaming series and movies. That is why we will not find any physical port beyond the power or Ethernet if we opt for the 128 GB model, which has it integrated. This multimedia center bets everything on wireless connectivity with its WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0.
Although the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 is also designed to play streaming movies and series, It has a USB-A 3.0 port, another USB-A 2.0, MicroSD card slot (with which to easily expand the internal storage), AV jack, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0.
These extra ports allow users to recharge wired devices or connect external storage media to play movies that are downloaded locally. A configuration proposal would be to occupy USB-A 2.0 with a USB receiver for a keyboard with a trackpad (many models designed for Smart TVs do not work with Bluetooth) and use USB-A 3.0 to put a hard drive and play multimedia content.
There are very powerful applications that take advantage of these ports, such as the vlc player or the aforementioned KODI.
And the price
We end with the point that is usually one of the decisive purchase factors: the price. There is not a big difference between the two, as if it could exist if compared to the proposals of Google or Amazon. The 3rd generation Apple TV 4K starts at 169 euros and the Nokia Streaming Box 8010 is priced at 129 euros.
You can be up to date and informed at all times of all the news from the Apple world and the SamaGame Selection offers on our Twitter, Facebook and Telegram profiles.
xbox live gold its days are numbered. Literally. As of September, the new plan to play online on Xbox consoles, its replacement, is called Game Pass Core. More than a name change, it is an entry option to Microsoft’s video game subscription service based on two claims: the multiplayer experience and access to a catalog of more than 25 games. From there, the two questions ask themselves: what will happen to my plan and what games are they?
The transition from Xbox Live Gold to Game Pass Core is automatic and will take place on September 14, 2023. According to Microsoft, it will no longer be possible to contract Xbox Live Gold from that month (which makes sense) and we will be able to continue enjoying all those games that we have claimed over the years as long as we have Game Pass Core as normal. In addition, it ensures that, despite the change, subscribers will maintain the price.
That being said, in the case of Xbox 360 games, items already claimed with Xbox Live Gold have always been owned by the playerwith which a subscription is not necessary to download or enjoy them via backward compatibility on Xbox One and Xbox Series X.
The first 19 Game Pass Core games announced
The second big change is that Microsoft will stop offering two games every month. To be honest, and with very few exceptions, Games with Gold have been advertised monthly for years without generating . At least, compared to free games on platforms like Epic Games or PlayStation Plus subscription games.
The good news, on the other hand, is that the new approach to the service chooses to offer access to a fixed selection of more than 25 games from Xbox Studios, Bethesda and third parties, adding two or three batches of novelties each year. And although we still don’t know if there will be Activision Blizzard games, since 19 titles have been released, the announced collection is wide, varied and forceful.
Game
Gender
editor
developer
multiplayer
year
Price
among us
Puzzle / Social
innersloth
innersloth
Yeah
2021
€4.99
descend
Sports
No More Robots
ragesquid
Yeah
2018
€24.99
Dishonored 2
RPG / Stealth
Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios
Arkane Studios
No
2016
€29.99
Eternal Doom
FPS
Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios
iDSoftware
Yeah
2020
€39.99
Fable Anniversary
RPG / Adventure
Xbox Game Studios
Lionhead Studios
No
2014
€39.99
fallout 4
RPG / Adventure
Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios
Bethesda Game Studios
No
2015
€19.99
Fallout 76
MMORPG
Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios
Bethesda Game Studios
Yeah
2018
€39.99
Force Horizon 4
Driving / Open World
Xbox Game Studios
Playground Games
Yeah
2018
€64.99
gear 5
Action / Shooter
Xbox Game Studios
The Coalition
Yeah
2019
€39.99
Grounded
Adventure / Survival
Xbox Game Studios
obsidian
Yeah
2022
€39.99
Halo 5: Guardians
FPS
Xbox Game Studios
SamaGame
Yeah
2015
€19.98
Halo Wars 2
Strategy
SamaGame / Xbox Game Studios
Creative Assembly
Yeah
2017
€39.98
Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice
Adventure
Ninja Theory/Xbox Game Studios
Ninja Theory
No
2018
€29.99
Human Fall Flat
platforms
Curve Games
No Brakes Games
Yeah
2017
€19.99
Inside
Adventure / Platforms
playdead
playdead
No
2016
€19.99
Ori & The Will of the Wisps
Adventure / Platforms
Xbox Game Studios
Moon Studios
No
2020
€29.99
psychonauts 2
Adventure / Platforms
Xbox Game Studios
Double Fine
No
2021
€59.99
State of Decay 2
Action / Survival
Xbox Game Studios
Undead Labs
Yeah
2018
€29.99
The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited
MMORPG
Bethesda/Xbox Game Studios
Zeni Max Online
Yeah
2015
€19.99
Official prices without promotion or discount for subscription to Game Pass.
Adventure, platforms, author-named role-playing, wild shots, driving and multiplayer options to take advantage of online. The range of titles goes from Fable Anniversary from 2014 to much more recent Groundedand offers true timeless essentials.
In the end, the general idea is not very different from the already retired PlayStation Plus Collection, being a welcome option for new players of Xbox consoles, as well as an additional incentive for those who buy very specific games like EA Sports FC 24, Street Fighter or Call of Duty that ask to be enjoyed online.
Logically, none of this applies to PC, where it is not possible to contract the Game Pass Core service. Among other reasons, because unlike consoles, desktop players do not need to pay to play online.
What difference is there with Xbox Live Gold and with the Game Pass of a lifetime
Also, a legacy aspect of Xbox Live Gold is the exclusive discounts. In this way, and based on the current prices in Europe, the table of prices and benefits It will stay that way from September 2023.
Xbox Live Gold (Discontinued)
Game Pass Core
Game Pass Console
GamePass PC
Game Pass Ultimate
Price
€6.99 / month
€6.99 / month
€10.99 /month
€9.99 / month
€14.99 /month
Games
Two games a month with Games with Gold
more than 25 games
Hundreds of console games
Hundreds of PC games
Hundreds of games for console and PC
EA Play Games
Online Multiplayer
Yes on Xbox 360, Xbox One, and XBox Series X/S
Yes on Xbox 360, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X/S
No
Does not apply
Yes on Xbox 360, Xbox One, and XBox Series X/S
On PC it is not necessary to play Online
News
Each 15 days
New games 2 or 3 times a year
Xbox Game Studios Launch Games
New games regularly
Xbox Game Studios Launch Games
New games regularly
Xbox Game Studios Launch Games
New games regularly
promotions
Discounts and offers for members
Discounts and offers for members
Riot Games Advantages
Discounts and offers for members
Riot Games Advantages
Discounts and offers for members
Riot Games Advantages
Discounts and offers for members
Free rewards (DLCs, exclusive content etc.)
Riot Games Advantages
cloud game
No
No
No
No
Yes, on the web, Xbox app, browsers, TVs, iOS and Android
key date
Discontinued in September 2023
Available from 2023
Available since 2017
Available from 2019
Available from 2019
Cloud gaming in Beta phase
How is the Game Pass Core proposal compared to the game Pass of a lifetime. Well, that depends on whether we are interested in playing online. Being cheaper to get the Game Pass Ultimate subscription to receive both services, the game in the cloud and all the advantages of EA Play. As we discussed, the successor to Xbox Live Gold is a gateway to Game Pass.
At the price level, it should be taken into account that Microsoft started the summer by readjusting the price of the Xbox Game Pass service, going from 9.99 euros to the current 10.99 euros and, in the case of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, going to cost 14 .99 euros compared to the initial 12.99 euros.
That said, the value of the content offered and the games, all told, still makes it a very worthwhile subscription. Above all, when all the next house bombings like Starfield and Forza Motorsport will arrive at launch, and it is not necessary to buy titles like Redfall to know if we will continue playing the next day.
Will we miss Xbox Live Gold? The only thing that changes from the new plan is the two games per month with Games with Gold. And it must be recognized that maintaining what has already been claimed and the instant addition of 25 games, including many of the best of the house, play in their favor. In any case, the temptation to get hold of to play online is much greater today than yesterday.
